Legal Opinion
Bittrick v. Consolidated Improvement Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1909No. 7552PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Poindexter, J., entered April 27, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action for specific performance of a contract to convey land.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.
— On the 24th of November, 1905, Arthur D. Jones & Co., as agent for the owner, entered into the fol*470lowing contract with the plaintiff Otto Bittrick for the sale of the real property "therein described:
“Received from Otto Bittrick the sum of Twenty & No.... dollars to apply on the first payment for purchase of lot ten (10) block fifteen (15) Nosler’s, with abstract and clear title within five days, at the price of 350.00 dollars, terms 1-3 cash; 1-3 six months; balance 18 months on or before.
“Upon being tendered deed and abstract showing clear title the purchaser shall have three days to…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Washington Beauty College, Inc. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Cogswell v. CogswellWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Dare v. Mount Vernon Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Ackerman v. MadduxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Chris Williams v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020