Legal Opinion
Nuskey v. Hochberg
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 26, 2010No. Civil Action 06-1573 (PLF)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s objections to this Court’s pro posed jury instructions which the Court communicated to counsel by e-mail on July 14, 2010. Plaintiff has filed a response to the defendant’s objections.
The defendant Export-Import Bank objects to the Court instructing the jury that plaintiff need only prove that gender discrimination or retaliation was “a motivating factor” in the Bank’s decision to fire her. The Bank argues that under a recent D.C. Circuit decision, the plaintiff has the responsibility…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ginger v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Smith v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sledge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Perry v. SHINSEKIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Beckham v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Ivey v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.