Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wilson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1898No. 1910PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEWDERSObi, Judge.

This is an appeal from a proceeding in the court below on writ of habeas corpus, in which the court refused to discharge the applicant, but held him in custody, to collect a fine of $100, '¡which had been imposed on him by the court, and to require him to answer a certain question before the grand jury. From the application and statement of facts it appears that the grand jury of Milam County were investigating a charge of theft of cattle, alleged to have been committed by C. J. Wells, Allen Isaacs, and applicant, Robert Wilson. Appellant was served with a subpoena duces…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Ex Parte ParkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MuncyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Ex Parte WoltersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. In Re BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Duckworth v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  5. Ex Parte NapoleonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API