Legal Opinion
Simon v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 26, 2014No. 13 Civ.1909(PAE)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
In her Amended Complaint, plaintiff Susan Simon alleges that defendant medical device manufacturer Smith & Nephew, Inc. (“Smith & Nephew”) designed, manufactured, and distributed the REFLECTION 3 Acetabular System (“R3 Acetabu-lar System”) and the optional metal liner component used in her hip replacement surgery, that the devices were defective, and that they caused her injury. Dkt. 23 (“Am. Compl.”). On December 3, 2013, this Court issued an Opinion & Order, 990 F.Supp.2d 395, 2013 WL 6244525, granting Smith & Nephew’s motion to dismiss the *425A…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Associated Press v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Sass v. MTA Bus Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Mouzon v. Radiancy, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- LPD N.Y., LLC v. Adidas Am., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Abdallah v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions FL Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.