Legal Opinion

Dawoud v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2016No. Docket 327915 and 327927PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal, 1 intervening plaintiffs Grace Transportation, Inc., and Utica Physical Therapy (collectively, the service providers) appeal the trial court’s order that granted summary disposition in favor of defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and dismissed their claims on the grounds that the service providers’ claims were barred because the insureds were precluded from recovery, as their underlying claims had been dismissed for discovery violations. For the reasons provided below, we affirm.

I. BASIC FACTS

On November 28, 2012, plaintiffs Kevin Dawoud,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Hodge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Moody v. Home Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Wyoming Chiropractic Health Clinic Pc v. Auto-Owners Ins CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Robert F Broz v. Plante & Moran PllcMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. American Anesthesia Assoc LLC v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Brenda Burton v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Carol a McBratnie v. Ditech Financial LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Deborah Dehaven v. Farm Bureau General Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API