Ewing v. Clark
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. This action was brought on the following instrument: “ St. Louis, July 25th, 1878. Twelve months after date I promise to pay C. C. Rainwater, administrator of estate of Henry Ewing, deceased, or order, for value received, $11,757.74, negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount, and with interest from date at the rate of eight per cent per annum, at the office of the Clerks’ Savings Bank, and if interest be not •paid…
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. This action was brought on the following instrument: “ St. Louis, July 25th, 1878. Twelve months after date I promise to pay C. C. Rainwater, administrator of estate of Henry Ewing, deceased, or order, for value received, $11,757.74, negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount, and with interest from date at the rate of eight per cent per annum, at the office of the Clerks’ Savings Bank, and if interest be not •paid annually, the same shall become principal and bear same rate of interest; I have deposited with him as collateral security 133…
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.
The opinion delivered by the court of appeals in determining this cause, when before it, satisfactorily disposes of all the questions presented by the record before us, which it is necessary to pass upon, and we affirm its judgment.
All concur.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Pitman v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Milan Bank v. RichmondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Third National Bank of St. Louis v. ReichertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Barnard State Bank v. FeslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.