Wahad v. Coughlin
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
On May 19, 1994, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of this court’s May 9, 1994 oral order denying his motion for issue-related sanctions and attorneys’ fees arising out of the defendant’s failure to comply with discovery requests and orders pursuant to Rules 26 and 37, F.R.C.P. In a memorandum decision dated June 16, 1994, this court granted plaintiffs motion to the extent of awarding attorney’s fees for work performed on the November, 1993 motion for sanctions, time spent reviewing documents produced at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation. (Appeal of Attorneys' Fee Awards)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Miele, Jr. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Davis v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Albunio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Pressman v. Estate of SteinvorthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995