Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 2000No. C0-99-1534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERTRAND PORITSKY, Judge. *

Appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to sever a charge of assault from charges of murder. Appellant also argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a Schwartz hearing to inquire into a juror’s claim that another juror pressured her into changing her vote. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Robert Quarry Jackson was charged with attempted aggravated robbery, second-degree assault, and two counts of second-degree murder arising from two separate incidents that both occurred on June 26, 1998, in Minneapolis.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. SlowinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, V. Robert Jesse HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  2. State of Minnesota v. Damon Lamont BanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna FlowersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API