Dry v. United Fire & Casualty Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, J.
Scotty Dry (“Dry”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of United Fire & Casualty Company (“United Fire”) in an equitable garnishment action under Section 379.200.1 Dry argues the trial court erred in finding the tortfeasor in the underlying personal injury action, Charley Reed (“Reed”), was not an insured. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Standard of Review
In a court-tried case, “we must affirm the trial court’s judgment unless it is not supported by substantial evidence, it is against the weight of the evidence, or it erroneously declares or applies the law.”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rodriguez v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Seeck v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Todd Ex Rel. Todd v. Missouri United School Insurance CouncilSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Burns v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Peters v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michael Newell v. Markel Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Monte Yager, Jr. v. Shelter General Insurance Company and Shelter Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Alltru Federal Credit Union v. Starnet Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Fluor Corporation v. Zurich American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Michael Newell v. Markel Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016