Legal Opinion

Neill Ex Rel. Neill v. Bach

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1950No. 173PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The appellant concedes that the principle of the acceleration of vested remainders has been recognized in this jurisdiction in several cases where the widow rejected the life estate devised to her with remainder to certain named beneficiaries. Cheshire v. Drewry, 213 N.C. 450, 197 S.E. 1; Young v. Harris, 176 N.C. 631, 97 S.E. 609; Baptist Female University v. Borden, 132 N.C. 476, 44 S.E. 47; Wilson v. Stafford, 60 N.C. 646.

However, it is contended by appellant in her brief, that an estate in remainder should not be accelerated when the renunciation results in a substantial diminution of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Springs v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Baptist Female University v. BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Thompson v. . HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. University v. . BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Pendleton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Keesler v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. McEwenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Union Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. EasterbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. American Trust Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API