Legal Opinion

Keesler v. North Carolina National Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1961No. 251PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The trial court adjudged that no portion, principal or income, of the 16,660 shares of stock of Auto Finance Company, referred to in the instrument executed by Emmie McConnell Moore Howerton on 9 February 1960, shall be paid to her by the trustee during her life time. Thus it is adjudged that the instrument is binding upon Mrs. Howerton. G.S. 36-41. No exception was taken to this ruling by any of the parties to the action. Therefore, this is the settled law of the case as to her.

On this appeal the question for determination is: What effect, if any, does the instrument have upon the rights and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carter v. KemptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. In Re WestfeldtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Baptist Female University v. BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. University v. . BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Bailey v. . McLainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hinson v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Vinson v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Estate of Mackie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Stellings v. AutrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. John Thomasson Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API