Legal Opinion

Homeside Lending, Inc. v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 16, 2001No. 991056-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Judge:

11 Appellant Homeside Lending, Ine. (Homeside) and eross-appellants Charles and Kathy Miller (the Millers), appeal from the trial court's Judgment Determining Priority and Extent of Liens in Real Property. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

BACKGROUND

T2 In 1982, the Millers entered into a uniform real estate contract with Commercial Security Bank (CSB) to purchase a parcel of real estate (the Property), The original amount of the real estate contract was $61,364, which included a previously existing trust deed in favor of First Security Bank for $58,880.41. As part of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. MacUmber v. ShaferWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Biddle v. Washington Terrace CityUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Nelson v. StokerUtah Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John Bird v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of UtahBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Carlson v. Diaz (In Re Carlson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. OrcuttDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2014
  4. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Morris v. Off-Piste Capital LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API