Legal Opinion

People v. Sorden

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2005No. S120677PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

A registered sex offender must, within five working days of the offender’s birthday, update his or her registration. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (a)(1)(D).)1 Willful failure to update one’s registration is a felony. (§290, subd. (g)(2).) In People v. Barker (2004) 34 Cal.4th 345 [18 Cal.Rptr.3d 260, 96 P.3d 507] (Barker), we held the willfulness element of the offense may not be negated by evidence the defendant “just forgot” to register. (Id. at p. 358.) We reserved judgment “as to whether forgetfulness resulting from, for example, an acute psychological condition, or a chronic…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wright v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Plasencia-Ayala v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. TOBAR-LOBOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
  4. The People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. RamirezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API