Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 2015No. 2D14-2061PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Based upon our independent review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm Diane Gail Murphy’s judgment and sentence without further comment. However, we remand with directions to correct a scrivener’s error which appears in both the judgment and the order of probation. Ms. Murphy was charged with, entered a plea to, and was sentenced for felony petit theft (two or more prior convictions for theft). See § 812.014(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). The judgment and order of probation, however, reflect that Ms. Murphy entered a plea to grand theft of property…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Folsom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API