Legal Opinion
Reinforcing Iron Workers Local Union 426 v. Bechtel Power Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 29, 1981No. 79-1124PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. .MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal of an order granting Bechtel Power Corporation’s motion for summary judgment. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan held that payments by an employer to an industry steward fund violated § 302(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 186(a). Reinforcing Iron Workers v. Bechtel Power Corporation, 463 F.Supp. 643 (E.D.Mich.1978). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.
Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 426 is the collective bargaining agent for reinforcing iron…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arroyo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. David KayeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Michael Costello v. Barry LipsitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Reinforcing Iron Workers Local Union 426 v. Bechtel Power Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- International Ass'n of Machinists Workers, Local Lodge 964 v. BF Goodrich Aerospace Aerostructures GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Trailways Lines, Inc. v. Trailways, Inc. Joint Council of the Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio, ClcCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Holmes v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- BASF Wyandotte Corp. v. Local 227, International Chemical Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.