Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 25, 2018No. A163995PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

*111Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, and menacing, ORS 163.190. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's imposition of court-appointed attorney fees in the amount of $642.

Defendant asserts that the trial court plainly erred in imposing attorney fees in the *253absence of evidence that he "is or may be able to pay" them. See ORS 151.505(3) ("The court may not require a person to pay costs under this section unless the person is or may be able to pay the costs."); ORS 161.665(4) ("The court may not sentence a defendant to pay costs under this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. BelenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. Mejia-EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. Orozoco-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HaddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. PickerelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. HannickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. KorumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. SkjervemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API