State v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
*111Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, and menacing, ORS 163.190. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's imposition of court-appointed attorney fees in the amount of $642.
Defendant asserts that the trial court plainly erred in imposing attorney fees in the *253absence of evidence that he "is or may be able to pay" them. See ORS 151.505(3) ("The court may not require a person to pay costs under this section unless the person is or may be able to pay the costs."); ORS 161.665(4) ("The court may not sentence a defendant to pay costs under this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. BelenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. Mejia-EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. Orozoco-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HaddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. PickerelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. HannickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. KorumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. SkjervemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.