Legal Opinion

Gupta v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing Office

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge COLINS.

Sanjay Gupta, M.D. (Provider) petitions for review of the decision of the Fee Hearing Officer of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Fee Review Office (Bureau) affirming a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Medical Fee Review Section that Provider’s Application for Fee Review (Application) was properly denied due to untimeliness under Section 306(f.l)(5) of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 77 P.S. § 531(5). We affirm.

On May 28, 2010, Provider treated a workers’ compensation claimant with Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance (TMR). (Medical Fee…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pittsburgh Mercy Health System v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Harburg Medical Sales Co. v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Medical Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Legion Insurance v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API