Gupta v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing Office
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge COLINS.
Sanjay Gupta, M.D. (Provider) petitions for review of the decision of the Fee Hearing Officer of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Fee Review Office (Bureau) affirming a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Medical Fee Review Section that Provider’s Application for Fee Review (Application) was properly denied due to untimeliness under Section 306(f.l)(5) of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 77 P.S. § 531(5). We affirm.
On May 28, 2010, Provider treated a workers’ compensation claimant with Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance (TMR). (Medical Fee…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pittsburgh Mercy Health System v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Harburg Medical Sales Co. v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Medical Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Legion Insurance v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012