Hoogendorn v. Daniel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
A motion is made to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that the plaintiff in error has paid and satisfied the judgment. The motion must be denied. One who voluntarily pays a judgment is not precluded from taking an appeal therefrom. County of Dakota v. Glidden, 113 U.S. 222, 5 S.Ct. 428, 28 L.Ed. 981; Erwin v. Lowry, 7 How. 172, 12 L.Ed. 655; O’Hara v. McConnell, 93 U.S. 150, 23 L.Ed. 840; Edwards v. Perkins, 7 Or. 149.
Error is assigned to the refusal to strike from the complaint those allegations which set up as elements of damage the payment of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Erwin v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- O'Hara v. MacConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Edwards v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Johnson's Administrator v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. BeecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Cramer v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Josevig -Kennecott Copper Co. v. James F. Howarth Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Staiger v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.