Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Maioffes

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 6, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The defendant was found guilty of violating an ordinance of the borough of Colchester forbidding the sale of firecrackers. In the original charter of the borough, granted in 1824, the warden and burgesses were given power, by § 10, to enact by-laws concerning certain matters, and the section concluded as follows: “Provided that no by-law shall be repugnant to the laws of the State, and that all by-laws made by the warden and burgesses, shall be approved by the borough in legal meeting assembled, and after being so approved shall be published at least three weeks successively in some public…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leete v. Griswold PostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. City of Hartford v. Hartford Theological SeminarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Fair Haven & Westville Railroad v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Reiley v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. Costa v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Town of East Haven v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Hutchison v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Moran v. WashburnConnecticut Superior Court · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Perry v. RaackeConnecticut Superior Court · 1953
  5. Arsenal School District v. Consolidated Town & City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API