Legal Opinion
vonLUSCH v. Hoffmaster
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 10, 1966No. Civ. 17120PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
The complaint in this case seeks a mandatory injunction against the Small Business Administration and its Regional Director requiring them “to cancel and rescind their requirement that the Plaintiffs secure a 100% performance bond and labor and materials payment bond as a condition of the grant of a loan to the Plaintiffs” under 15 U.S.C.A. § 636. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Two provisions of the Small Business Act are particularly important in this case. Section 634(b) (1)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaughnessy v. PedreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Small Business Administration v. McClellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Mel's Lockers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leong T. Mar and Thick Gon Mar v. Thomas Kleppe, Administrator of the Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Jets Services, Inc. v. HoffmanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- Dubrow v. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
- United States v. Techno Fund, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
- Capital Refrigeration, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.