Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Wiborg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1985No. C7-84-1686PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

This is an appeal taken from an order denying a motion for a new trial based upon a claim that the jury’s award was excessive. We affirm.

FACTS

This is a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident. At the time of the accident, plaintiff John Dailey, a 26-year old paramedic, was an active diver and coached diving part time at a local school.

Dailey required surgery — a posterior wiring of the fifth and sixth vertabrae. He now suffers 15'/ permanent disability of the cervical spine, ongoing headaches and neck pains. Because of these injuries, he has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Verhel Ex Rel. Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Cafferty v. MonsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Mervin v. Magney Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API