Ex Parte Briggs
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.
The action is in habeas corpus praying for the discharge of petitioner from the workhouse of the city of Dayton, Ohio, to which he was committed from the Municipal Court of Dayton.
The petition recites that petitioner was unlawfully imprisoned and restrained by virtue of a “certain pretended instrument of writing of which a true copy is hereto attached, marked ‘A,’ ” etc. No such exhibit is attached to the petition but upon the averments of the answers and statements of defendant in his brief, which are binding upon him, it appears that petitioner was brought to trial upon a complaint charging…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Hamilton v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Lerch v. City of SanduskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
- Ex parte PharrOhio Court of Appeals · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Hudlin v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BlagajevicOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. WintersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. ShankOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.