Legal Opinion

State v. Caldwell Sugars, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1936No. 33734PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRUNOT, Justice.

This is a proceeding by rule to enforce the payment, by Caldwell Sugars, Inc., of a certain corporation franchise tax alleged to be due by said corporation for the years 1933 and 1934. The tax for 1933 is levied by Act No. 8 of 1932, and the tax for 1934 is levied by Act No. 8 of 1932, as amended by Act No. 18 of 1934. The defenses relied upon by Caldwell Sugars, Inc., are clearly set forth in article 2 of its return to the rule, which we quote;

“That Caldwell Sugars, Inc., feeing engaged in mechanical, agricultural or horticultural pursuits, is exempt from the payment of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Pearce v. CouvillonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Interstate Tax Bureau, Inc. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  4. State v. Bisso Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. State v. Xeter Realty, LimitedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API