Sturgeon v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Denzil D. Sturgeon appeals his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, a class D felony. He alleges the trial court's jury instructions impermissibly shifted to him the burden of persuasion on the element of intoxication. 2
We reverse.
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact nee-essary to constitute the crime with which he is charged. Francis v. Fronklin (1985), 471 U.S. 807, 814, 105 S.Ct. 1965, 1971, 85 LEd.2d 344 citing In re Winship (1970), 397…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dannie Carl Pattison v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Regan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Stackhouse v. ScanlonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Shaw v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.