Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided March 1, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Director Saffle,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Opinion addressing, in effect, the following question:

Who has financial responsibility for medical expenses ofinmates incarcerated in the custody of the Oklahoma Department ofCorrections who are properly referred to private medicalproviders because the inmates were not admitted to the UniversityHospitals?

I

¶ 1 The State of Oklahoma has a constitutional "obligation to provide medical care for those whom it is punishing by incarceration." Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). The United States Supreme Court has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Willie Smart v. Romeo Villar, Chief Medical Officer, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  5. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API