Legal Opinion

Pansa v. Damiano

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1964PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Desmond.

Petitioners Alexander and Ruth Pansa own a dwelling house and lot fronting on Rose Place in a residential (A-2, two-family) zone in the City of Utica. The nearest cross street is Genesee Street. On the comer of Rose Place and Genesee Street nearest to petitioners’ house is the commercially zoned and commercially used property owned by one Sitrin, with its front line on Genesee Street, its side line on Rose Place, and its rear boundary adjacent to the side line of petitioners’ Rose Place lot. This proceeding was brought to review a determination of the city’s Zoning Board…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Missere v. GrossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Brookside Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Jefferson County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cave v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Fox v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Woodley Park Community Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API