Legal Opinion
Stern Co. v. Friedman
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1925No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
The subject of this litigation has been here before. In Stern Co. v. Friedman, 211 Mich. 639, a bill asking for a declaration of rights, under Act No. 150, Pub. Acts 1919, was dismissed, because the act was unconstitutional. In Stern Co. v. Friedman, 218 Mich. 258, a bill for specific performance was dismissed, with leave to proceed for damages on the law side of the court. Pleadings were thereupon amended to accord with an action at law, hearing had in the circuit, and plaintiff held to be without remedy. The case is here by writ of error. A full statement of the facts will be found in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Castle Creek Water Co. v. City of AspenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Nakdimen v. Atkinson Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Grosvenor v. FlintSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hoffer Oil Corporation v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Commonwealth Trust Co. v. Hachmeister Lind Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Kordis v. Auto Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Stone v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.