Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2003No. M2002-01281-SC-R3-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ„ joined.

This appeal involves the petition of Sam Thomas Burnett for reinstatement to the practice of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, section 19. The sole issue on appeal is whether the petitioner has the competency and learning in law required to practice law in this State. Both the hearing committee and the trial court found the petitioner to be morally fit to practice law in this State and determined that his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scruggs v. BracyTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Patty v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel ex rel. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dennis J. Hughes v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Board of Professional Responsibility v. LoveTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Dennis J. Hughes v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API