Burnett v. Board of Professional Responsibility
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,
delivered the opinion of the court,
in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ„ joined.
This appeal involves the petition of Sam Thomas Burnett for reinstatement to the practice of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, section 19. The sole issue on appeal is whether the petitioner has the competency and learning in law required to practice law in this State. Both the hearing committee and the trial court found the petitioner to be morally fit to practice law in this State and determined that his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scruggs v. BracyTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Patty v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel ex rel. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dennis J. Hughes v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Board of Professional Responsibility v. LoveTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Dennis J. Hughes v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2008