Legal Opinion
Nevada Bell v. Hurn
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 1989No. 19129PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent, Brian Hurn, is an employee of appellant, Nevada Bell. Hurn was injured in the course of his employment and received worker’s compensation benefits from Nevada Bell. Hurn instituted two civil actions against third parties for compensatory damages resulting from the accident. One action was brought against the tortfeasor, Mr. Padellford, and the other action was brought against Hum’s own insurer, Valley Forge. Nevada Bell filed a notice of lien pursuant to NRS 616.560, the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act, in the amount of $24,901.60.
Hurn settled the Padellford action for…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Transport Indemnity Company v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Breen v. Caesars PalaceNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- State Industrial Insurance System v. JeschNevada Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- County Workers Compensation Pool v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Wendell Phillips and Wanda Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- STATE, VICTIMS OF CRIME FUND v. BarryNevada Supreme Court · 1990