Legal Opinion

STATE, VICTIMS OF CRIME FUND v. Barry

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1990No. 20101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondents Christopher and Nancy Barry were severely injured in an attack by an escaped convict. They each received compensation of $15,000.00 from appellant State of Nevada Victims of Crime Fund. Thereafter, their lawsuit relating to the attack was settled with third parties for $540,000.00. Following the settlement, the Crime Fund filed a subrogation lien for full reimbursement from the Barrys, but the Barrys maintained that they owed the Crime Fund only partial reimbursement, as calcu lated using the formula set forth in Breen v. Caesars Palace, 102 Nev. 79, 715 P.2d 1070 (1986).…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Breen v. Caesars PalaceNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ayers-Schaffner v. SolomonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Aylward v. DragusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Nevada Bell v. HurnNevada Supreme Court · 1989

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Canfora v. Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Daniels v. Vermont Center for Crime Victims ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  3. Gee v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Gee v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API