Legal Opinion

Tamara Dukette v. Daniel Brazas

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 8, 2014No. 2013-230PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, C.J.

Following a two-day trial in Superior Court (Smukler, J.), the jury determined that the defendant, Daniel Brazas, was not legally at fault for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Tamara Dukette, when she slipped and fell on ice at her apartment, which was owned by the defendant. The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in preventing counsel from addressing and examining the jury panel during attorney-conducted voir dire. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. On February 19, 2013, following the final pretrial conference in this matter, the trial court issued a written…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. ButlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. State v. NoucasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. State v. DorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  4. McCarthy v. WheelerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Appeal of Northern New England Telephone Operations, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  2. K.L.N. Construction Company, Inc. & a. v. Town of PelhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  3. Thomas M. Benoit & a. v. Joseph A. Cerasaro, Trustee of the Joseph A. Cerasaro Revocable Trust & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. In the Matter of Nicholas Kelly and Astrid Fernandes-PrabhuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  5. Mark E. McDonough v. Patrick M. McDonough & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API