Legal Opinion

Richards-Wilcox, Inc. v. Cummins

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1998No. 69A01-9709-CV-285PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUCKER, Judge.

Kelly and Lisa Cummins (referred to collectively as “the Cummins”) filed a complaint against Richards-Wileox, Inc. (“Wilcox”) for personal injuries. Wilcox responded by filing a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings contending the complaint was filed outside of the applicable statute of limitations. The trial court denied the motion. Wilcox appeals contending the trial court erred in so doing. We affirm.

Kelly Cummins was an employee of Hil-lenbrand Industries. Hillenbrand manufactures hospital beds which are transported throughout the Hillenbrand plant by way of an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. J.A.W. v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Klebes v. Forest Lake Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Freson v. CombsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Fox Development, Inc. v. EnglandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Alan Patrick McEntee v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Lt. Henry G.L. McCullough and Princess S.D. Naro-McCullough v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. RIETH-RILEY CONST. CO., INC. v. GibsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API