Richards-Wilcox, Inc. v. Cummins
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUCKER, Judge.
Kelly and Lisa Cummins (referred to collectively as “the Cummins”) filed a complaint against Richards-Wileox, Inc. (“Wilcox”) for personal injuries. Wilcox responded by filing a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings contending the complaint was filed outside of the applicable statute of limitations. The trial court denied the motion. Wilcox appeals contending the trial court erred in so doing. We affirm.
Kelly Cummins was an employee of Hil-lenbrand Industries. Hillenbrand manufactures hospital beds which are transported throughout the Hillenbrand plant by way of an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- J.A.W. v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Klebes v. Forest Lake Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Freson v. CombsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Fox Development, Inc. v. EnglandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Alan Patrick McEntee v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lt. Henry G.L. McCullough and Princess S.D. Naro-McCullough v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2017
- RIETH-RILEY CONST. CO., INC. v. GibsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.