Phœnix Ins. Co. of London v. Stobaugh
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, Justice.
The parties will be designated as appellant and appellee.
Appellee sued appellant upon its policy of insurance for $2,400, covering a house owned by appellee, which was alleged to have been totally destroyed by fire. This appellant denied, and the issue was submitted to the jury as follows: “Were the remnants of the structure in controversy left standing after the fire reasonably adapted for use as a basis upon which to restore the building to the condition in which it was before the fire?”
The jury answered the issue in the negative, and judgment was accordingly rendered for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Royal Insurance Co. v. McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. StrayhornTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- National Liberty Ins. v. DansbyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Reliance Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Chicago Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phoenix Assurance Co. of London v. StobaughTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Adamson v. BurgleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Republic Insurance v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Republic Ins. Co. v. HaleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937