Legal Opinion

People v. Gallagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of two counts of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]). We reject defendant’s contention that the sentence of two weekends in jail and a fine of $1,000 is unduly harsh or severe. Deterrence is a legitimate consideration in sentencing (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306), particularly in the context of imposing a sentence for driving while intoxicated, which is widely recognized as a critical societal problem. Although deterrence alone would not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. WhitingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. People v. JensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. HelmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. BenedictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Baride (Diayson)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
  2. People v. Chunicarchi (Jose)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
  3. People v. Onyeukwu (Bruno)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API