Legal Opinion
Antine v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael D. Stallman, J.
These 13 separate 9/11-related applications for leave to serve late notices of claim on respondent City of New York are hereby consolidated for decision.1 These proceedings raise significant questions of subject matter jurisdiction, statute of limitations and commencement by filing.
Background
Petitioners allege that they were exposed to toxic substances during rescue/recovery, construction, and demolition operations at Ground Zero, following the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Five proposed notices of claim…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- D & A Grandview LLC v. 60 Davidson LLCNew York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2024
- D & A Grandview LLC v. 60 Davidson LLCNew York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2024
- DeCicco v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mathewson v. Town of KentNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Antoine v. BoylandNew York Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.