Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Thomasville v. Stone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

It does not clearly appear from the record that any evidence was offered in the trial below. The case on appeal states: “After the jury was selected, upon inquiry of counsel for defendants by the court, as set forth in the judgment in this action, the court rendered the judgment hereinbefore set out, from which said judgment of confirmation of sale and judgment in this action the defendants, and each of them, excepted and appealed to the Supreme Court.” There follows a copy of certain deeds and other documents affecting the title to the premises in controversy. As the judgment cites . . .…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dixon v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Mebane v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Harrell v. Blythe.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Dixon v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beaufort County v. . BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Town of Dunn v. TewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Brinkley v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Baker v. MurphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Campbell v. Peoples Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API