Custom Hardware Engineering & Consulting, Inc. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Chief Justice.
Custom Hardware Engineering, Inc. (CHE) appeals an Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) decision determining that CHE is liable for use tax plus interest and additions to tax on its purchases of parts for use in fulfilling maintenance contracts. CHE asserts that it is not liable for any use tax because it did not use the parts and, instead, retained them for “temporary storage” as provided in section 144.605(13), RSMo 2000.1 The record demonstrates that CHE used the parts for testing and certification on behalf of its customers. Therefore, CHE is liable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Tax Commission v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- DST Systems, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- J.C. Nichols Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- ICC Management, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- MFA Petroleum Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
3Cited by8 opinions
- 801 Skinker Boulevard Corp. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. TruebloodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Loren Cook Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Eilian v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Featherston v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.