In Re Schenck
Supreme Court of North Carolina
PbtxtioN for a writ of habeas corpus, heard before this court at this term. All the facts necessary to an understanding of the ease are ■stated in the opinion of the court. “
1Opinion of the CourtBynum, J.
In the matter of Schenck. The petition in this case was filed before me, and as it is case of much importance and public concern, I asked the assistance and advice of all the Justices of the Supreme Court. The case was accordingly argued before the whole court by the Attorney General on behalf of the State, and by Mr. R. H. Battle for the petitioner. With the advice and concurrence of all the Judges, the motion was denied and the following opinion, filed:
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus, upon the following state of facts :
At the Fall Term, 1875, of the Superior Court of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Childs v. . Martin .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ex parte MooneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Dye v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re HolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- In Re CroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.