Capital Options Investments, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation v. Goldberg Brothers Commodities, Incorporated and Linnco Futures, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Capital Options Investments (“Capital”) brought this diversity suit, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, alleging breach of contract and tor-tious interference with its prospective economic advantage by Goldberg Brothers Commodities, Inc. (“Goldberg”) and Linnco Futures, Inc. (“Linnco”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
During the period relevant to this suit, Capital was an introducing broker for commodity options investments sold to the retail public. Goldberg, a futures commission merchant, had a contractual agreement with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- David STUMPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS & SKINNER, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Renovitch v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Frank Lascola v. Us Sprint CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Geldermann and Company, Inc. v. Lane Processing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Ricky Outlaw v. Herb Newkirk and Cameron Mable, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Cramer v. Insurance Exchange AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Continental Bank, N.A. v. Robinson O. EverettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- S. Donald Valenti and Patricia Valenti v. Qualex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Chrysler Credit Corporation, Plaintiff-Third/party v. Nancy Marino, and Herman J. Marino, Defendant-Third/partyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.