Legal Opinion

Stephanie McGee v. Department of Child Support Se

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 2014No. 13-16131UnpublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Stephanie McGee appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in her action concerning child support payments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, K2 Am. Corp. v. Roland Oil & Gas, LLC, 653 F.3d 1024, 1027 (9th Cir.2011), and for an abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of leave to proceed IFP, Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir.1998) (per curiam). We affirm.

The district court properly concluded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Minetti v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. K2 America Corp. v. Roland Oil & Gas, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. (PC) Bullard v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. (PC) Magallanes Castro v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. (PC) Singh v. BlizzardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Singh v. BlizzardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PS) Aderholt v. CooperDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API