Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Burger
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWhipple, C.J.
li.I am constrained to agree with the per curiam opinion herein that because there is no executable majority, we are unable to render judgment in this case. However, as to the merits of the Burgers’ appeal, for the reasons which follow, I would find merit to their contention that the trial court erred in finding that the judgment approving the Separation of Property Agreement they executed during their marriage was void ab initio and would further remand this matter for further proceedings on the revocatory action brought pursuant to LSA-C.C. art. 2036,
Stated as succinctly as possible, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parish Nat. Bank v. WilksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Louisiana Lift & Equipment, Inc. v. EizelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Rush v. RushLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Boyer v. BoyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Clay v. ClayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.