Legal Opinion

Rush v. Rush

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 2013No. 2012 CW 1502PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

| jjThis appeal was taken by appellant, Lynn E. Peuschold, from a judgment declaring a purported matrimonial agreement to be valid as to form. For the following reasons, we convert this appeal *510into a supervisory writ, reverse the trial court judgment, and render declaratory judgment in favor of appellant.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 30,1993, Ms. Peuschold, and appellee, Randall C. Rush, signed a matrimonial agreement purporting to establish a separation of property regime between them during their contemplated marriage. The document was executed before a notary, but was not signed by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herlitz Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. RJ Messinger, Inc. v. RosenblumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. Arabie v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  4. Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Texas Gas Exploration Corp. v. Lafourche Realty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nicaud v. NicaudLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Danielle Deon Dickerson Acurio v. Dr. Michael Thomas AcurioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
  3. In re State I.K.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Deshotels v. DeshotelsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Benedetto v. BenedettoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API