Legal Opinion
In re Claff
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 1, 1901No. 3,543PublishedCited by 8 opinions
In Bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
Claff was adjudicated bankrupt in. 1899 upon a voluntary petition. His discharge was refused for fraudulent concealment of assets. In 1900 he filed a second petition, and seeks a discharge thereunder. That his discharge under the second petition, if obtained, will be no bar to a suit upon a debt sched*507tiled under the first commission, and not proved under the second, seems clear. Gilbert v. Hebard, 8 Metc. (Mass.) 129; In re Drisko, 2 Low. 430, Fed. Cas. No. 4,090. See Dean v. Justices, 173 Mass. 453, 53 N. E. 893. But this fact does not prevent the bankrupt from filing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marshall Paper Co. v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- In re BlackDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1899
- In re DriskoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1875
- Dean v. Justices of Municipal CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re ZeilerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- In re LevitanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- In re PullianDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1909
- In re CooperDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
- In re KufflerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.