Curiel v. Quinn
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Brazil, J.:
In a garnishment action, Edward N. Curiel appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for judgment against Kirby Quinn. The district court ruled the garnishment reached only money actually due from Kirby at the time the garnishee, Kirby, filed his answer of garnishment. Curiel contends the garnishment reaches beyond the monthly payments by Kirby to the total amount Kirby owed. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. In August 1991, Curiel had a judgment against Jeanice Quinn for $2,750 plus $828.01 accrued interest. Jeanice, pursuant to a property settlement agreement in a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
- Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Kansas Department of Revenue v. Coca Cola Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Harpster v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Lewis v. BarnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fletcher D. Sapp and Ruth Sapp v. Leopold H. Greif, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Mainland Investment Group v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017