Legal Opinion
Nathan S. Smith v. Commanding Officer, Air Force Accounting and Finance Center, Arthur R. Grimm and Jeannine Grimm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1977No. 76-3530PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Smith appeals from an order of the District Court denying leave to amend the jurisdictional allegations of Smith’s complaint and dismissing the action. We affirm.
The relevant facts are discussed in Smith v. Grimm, 534 F.2d 1346 (9th Cir. 1976). Briefly, Smith is an attorney who represented Grimm, on a contingent fee basis, in an action in which it was established that Grimm had been wrongfully discharged from the Air Force. Smith now seeks a declaration that he holds an attorney’s lien on amounts of retirement pay the Air Force owes Grimm. Smith alleges that Grimm has refused to pay him 50%…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- John W. Brennan v. University of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Nathan S. Smith v. Arthur R. Grimm and Jeannine GrimmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by19 opinions
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
- City of Whittier (Subrogee of Charles Hoover) v. United States Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration), Les KinneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Association v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.