Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Highfill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 8, 1930No. 19310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

In this cause the parties occupied the relation of master and servant. The servant, R. T. Highfill, defendant in error and plaintiff below,, recovered a judgment against the master, the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, plaintiff in error and defendant below, in a personal injury action brought and tried on the theory that the federal doctrine of the common law of master and servant controlled the merits oí the case for that the defendant was engaged in interstate commerce at the time of plaintiff’s injury.

Upon defendant’s motion to make his petition more definite and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Homestake Min. Co. v. FullertonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. Cudahy Packing Co. v. SkoumalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Shunkamolah v. Potter DelcoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Leierer v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API