Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1988No. CR-86-0054-APPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Court of Appeals Judge.

In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), the court held it to be a denial of equal protection for a prosecutor to use his peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of defendant’s race. In State v. Holder, 155 Ariz. 83, 745 P.2d 141 (1987), we held that a potential Batson error must be raised at trial, or it is waived. We are now required to determine when objection must be made. In this case, the first objection was made not at the time that peremptory strikes were exercised but the next day after the jury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Clyde Major Thompson, AKA Clyde JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Frederick ForteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. State v. HolderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. HolderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. AndrewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. KnightMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API