Legal Opinion

Mihalcik v. Lensink

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 9, 1990No. Civ. H-89-529 (PCD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, two current Connecticut Valley Hospital (“CVH”) patients, sue “on behalf of all persons with mental retardation who are, were, or in the future will be patients at CVH,” a state mental institution located in Middletown. Amended Complaint, 111. Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification has been stayed pending resolution of defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs allege violations of Section 123(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6023(a), and their Fourteenth Amendment rights to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. VoinovichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  2. In Re State Police LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
  3. Cameron v. TomesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
  4. Hawai'i Disability Rights Center v. CheungDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API