Legal Opinion
Burke v. Pitney Bowes Inc. Long Term Disability Plan
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 1, 2009No. C 04-4483 MHPPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Re: Cross-Motions for Judgment
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cara A. Burke seeks, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), review of the decision of defendant Pitney Bowes Inc. Long Term Disability Plan (“the Plan”) to deny Burke long term disability (“LTD”) benefits. The action was initially filed in late 2004. On January 3, 2006, 2006 WL 13097, this court denied Burke’s motion for summary judgment, granted the Plan’s motion for summary judgment, and entered judgment for the Plan. See Docket No. 38. Burke subsequently appealed. While her…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matlock v. Pitney-Bowes, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010