Legal Opinion

In Re Farrar

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont

Decided April 2, 1998No. 19-10032PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DENYING LIEN AVOIDANCE

FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtor moves to avoid 1 a judicial lien of $16,400 on his homestead awarded to Creditor, his former wife, by the Windham County Family Court in the parties’ divorce. Farrar v. Farrar, F166-4-95 WmDmd, slip op. at 15 (Vt. Windham County Fam. Ct. Jan. 27, 1997) (Hereinafter “Fam. Ct.”). We sustain Creditor’s objection, holding that her lien is not avoidable.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Debtor acquired the property, in which he claims a homestead interest, before his 1989 marriage to Creditor. They separated in 1994. On April…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Heggen v. PemeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Emmons v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Lalumiere v. LalumiereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re HutchinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2004
  2. Devenger v. Forant (In Re Forant)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2004
  3. In re PattersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API